Apple 一年付 Google 10 億美元,新版 Siri 改用 Gemini 大腦:這筆交易看懂了嗎

Apple 砸一年約 10 億美元,向 Google 租用一顆 1.2 兆參數的客製 Gemini 模型來驅動新 Siri。一向自己幹的蘋果,為何這次選擇外包大腦?對台灣 15 億台裝置的使用者又意味著什麼?

How long has it been since you last seriously asked Siri to do something for you? I asked my friends around me, and most of them replied, "Setting alarms, playing music, nothing more." This voice assistant, which has been criticized for several years, will get a brand-new "brain" in 2026 - and this "brain" is not developed by Apple itself, but rather rented from its competitor, Google.

For a company known for doing everything itself and keeping everything under its control, this decision is news in itself.

Event Background

Apple and Google announced their cooperation on January 12 this year, with Apple obtaining the right to use a customized Gemini model for Siri and Apple Intelligence. This deal is estimated to be worth around $1 billion per year. At the WWDC 2026 in June, the new Siri powered by Gemini was officially unveiled and is expected to be pushed to around 1.5 billion daily active devices worldwide through iOS 26.4.

The dramatic aspect of this event lies in the fact that Apple's AI progress has been criticized for being slow in recent years, and its own model has not been able to support a smart enough Siri. After evaluating the solutions offered by OpenAI and Anthropic, Apple chose Google, citing that "Google's technology provides the most capable foundation." In other words, this once-proud player has acknowledged that it needs to borrow someone else's "brain" in the field of large models.

Key Points

  • Customized 1.2 billion-parameter Gemini model: This model is tailored by Google for Apple, with a scale approximately eight times that of Apple's current cloud model (around 1.5 billion parameters). It adopts a hybrid expert (MoE) architecture, specializing in optimizing tasks such as summarization, planning, and natural language understanding, which are essential for Siri.
  • Around $1 billion per year: This is the level of licensing fees Apple pays to Google.
  • Protecting privacy with "distillation": This is a crucial design aspect. Apple engineers use Google's "teacher model" to train a more compact Apple base model. When users interact with Siri, their data will not be sent to Google, equivalent to borrowing a brain without sharing data.
  • Developers need to rewrite their code: At WWDC, Apple also announced the replacement of the old SiriKit with App Intents, requiring developers to migrate their apps to be compatible with the new Siri.

Market Impact Analysis

For Taiwanese users: If you are an iPhone user, the most direct change is that Siri may finally "understand human language and handle complex tasks." In the past, Siri was limited to single instructions, but with the support of Gemini, the new version is expected to process multi-step, contextual requests. However, there are two practical reminders: first, the actual performance of traditional Chinese needs to be verified after launch, as Apple's localization in Chinese often requires time to refine; second, these advanced features are usually tied to newer models and systems, so older iPhones may not be compatible.

For enterprise applications: This deal amplifies a signal - even Apple chooses to "rent" top-level models instead of building its own. For Taiwanese enterprises, this is a kind of endorsement: you don't have to train models yourself; it's practical to connect to the most powerful existing models and spend resources on your applications and data. The focus shifts from "should I do AI myself" to "how can I smartly use others' AI."

For developers: The replacement of SiriKit with App Intents is a clear action signal. Taiwanese developers who want their apps to be compatible with the new Siri and integrated into this AI experience need to start researching migration. This is both a threshold and an opportunity - getting your app connected to the voice entry of 1.5 billion devices has considerable value.

Future Development Trends

The most intriguing aspect of this deal is that it makes two competitors interdependent. Google gains $1 billion per year and the badge of "even Apple chooses me"; Apple supplements its weakest link at a relatively affordable cost and preserves its privacy trump card through distillation. While this is a win-win situation in the short term, whether Apple will slowly nurture its own model and replace Google in the long term is worth watching - after all, "borrowing a brain" has never been the end goal for Apple; self-control is.

Another trend is that "models as infrastructure" are becoming increasingly evident. Top-tier large models are turning into basic services like electricity and cloud computing, provided by a few companies and used by others for a fee. This has a profound impact on the power structure of the entire industry.

TheAI Academy Summary and Commentary

Many people interpret this news as "Apple admits defeat," which I think is an oversimplification. The truly smart aspect is that Apple separates "whose model is the strongest" from "who controls user data and experience" - the brain can be rented, but the entrance, devices, privacy, and ultimately the user relationship are firmly in Apple's hands. Renting a brain is far more cost-effective than handing over users.

The essence of Apple's move is not "using Gemini," but "using Gemini without letting Google touch my users" - this is the consistent calculation of this company.

Practical advice for Taiwanese readers: don't rush to expect Siri to transform overnight; the actual performance of traditional Chinese and device limitations need to be verified after launch. However, if you are a developer, migrating to App Intents is worth doing now; if you are a general user, take this as a signal that Siri is worth giving another chance, and expect improvements with a rational and practical mindset.

Data Sources

(This article is compiled based on publicly available information and is subject to Apple and Google's official announcements. Functionality, launch schedules, and device support are subject to the latest official information.)

Frequently Asked Questions

新版 Siri 用 Google 的 Gemini,我的隱私會外洩給 Google 嗎?

據官方說法不會。Apple 採用「蒸餾」技術,用 Google 的大模型訓練自家精簡模型,使用者與 Siri 互動的資料不會送進 Google,等於借用模型能力但不交出資料。

台灣的 iPhone 什麼時候能用到新 Siri?繁中好用嗎?

新 Siri 隨 iOS 26.4 推送,但進階功能通常綁較新機型與系統。繁體中文的實際表現需待上線實測,Apple 的中文在地化一向需要時間磨合,建議理性期待。

Apple 自己不是有 AI 嗎?為何要跟對手 Google 合作?

Apple 自家模型在大型語言模型這局進度落後,難以撐起夠聰明的 Siri。它評估過 OpenAI、Anthropic 後選擇 Google,務實地『租用最強模型』補短板,同時靠蒸餾保住隱私與使用者關係。

我是 App 開發者,這對我有影響嗎?

有。Apple 以 App Intents 取代舊的 SiriKit,想讓 App 整合進新 Siri 語音體驗的開發者需規劃遷移。早一步卡位 15 億台裝置的語音入口,具策略價值。

繁體中文版 →